var arr = []
arr.unshift(42)
[42].concat(arr)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
arr.unshift(42) | |
[42].concat(arr) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
arr.unshift(42) | 26330.9 Ops/sec |
[42].concat(arr) | 1664.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
What is being tested?
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches to add an element to the end of an array: arr.unshift(42)
and [42].concat(arr)
. The goal is to determine which approach is faster.
Options compared
There are only two options being compared:
arr.unshift(42)
: This method adds a new element to the beginning of the array. It shifts all existing elements down by one position, making room for the new element.[42].concat(arr)
: This method creates a new array with the original array as its first element and the new number 42
as its second element.Pros and Cons
1. arr.unshift(42)
Pros:
Cons:
2. [42].concat(arr)
Pros:
Cons:
unshift
, as it creates a new array with two elements: the original array and the new number.Library and its purpose
In this benchmark, the JavaScript Array class is used. The Array class provides methods like push()
, unshift()
, and concat()
that allow developers to manipulate array elements.
Special JS feature or syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that this benchmark might not be representative of real-world scenarios, as it only tests two specific methods on a small array. In practice, you may encounter different performance characteristics when working with larger arrays or more complex data structures.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to test other approaches for adding elements to an array, some additional options could include:
Array.prototype.push()
instead of unshift()
Array.prototype.splice()
to insert a new element at a specific positionArray.prototype.set()
if you're working with older browsers that support this methodHowever, these alternatives are not being tested in this benchmark.