var array = Array(100000).fill(0).map(v => parseInt(Math.random() * (1000000 - 0) + 0))
Math.min(array)
Math.max(array)
array.sort((a, b) => a - b)
array.sort((a, b) => b - a)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Math.min | |
Math.max | |
sort (asc) | |
sort (desc) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Math.min | 6464.9 Ops/sec |
Math.max | 6508.1 Ops/sec |
sort (asc) | 796.6 Ops/sec |
sort (desc) | 795.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of three different approaches to find the minimum or maximum value in an array:
Math.min()
functionMath.max()
functionOptions Compared
Math.min()
vs Math.max()
: This comparison tests the performance of finding the smallest and largest values in an array using built-in JavaScript functions.Library Used
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided benchmark. However, it's likely that the Array.prototype
methods (e.g., fill()
, map()
) are used as part of the benchmark.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The benchmark uses the Math.random()
function to generate random numbers for creating an array with random values. This is a standard JavaScript feature and not specific to any particular version or syntax.
Benchmark Preparation Code
The preparation code creates an array of 100,000 elements, each initialized with a random integer value between 0 and 1,000,000.
Other Considerations
ExecutionsPerSecond
value indicates how many times each operation is executed per second, providing an idea of the relative performance of each approach.Alternatives
Some alternative approaches to finding the minimum or maximum value in an array include:
Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches will depend on specific use cases and hardware configurations.