var arr = Array.from({length: 100000}).fill(Math.random())
var a = arr.sort();
var min = a[0];
var min = Math.min([arr]);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.sort | |
Math min and max |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.sort | 58.8 Ops/sec |
Math min and max | 466.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The website is testing two different approaches to find the minimum value in an array: Array.sort()
vs Math.min()
. The benchmark is designed to measure which approach is faster.
Options Compared
There are only two options compared:
Pros and Cons
Other Considerations
** could be used instead of
Math.min()`, as it provides more flexibility and can handle arrays with multiple minimum values. or **setTimeout()
, which can be used to optimize performance-critical code.Library and Syntax
There are no libraries being used in this benchmark. However, if you're interested in using a library for similar benchmarks, some popular options include:
Math.min()
.Now, let's talk about special JS features or syntax. There are none mentioned in this benchmark.
Alternatives
If you want to create a similar benchmark, here are some alternatives:
Array.prototype.map()
vs forEach()
String.prototype.split()
vs Regex.exec()
Array.prototype.find()
vs filter()