Benchmark: For vs Foreach vs While

Script Preparation code:

var array = new Array(100);

Tests:

For
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) { array[i]; }
Foreach
array.forEach(function(i) { array[i]; });
While
var i = 0; while (i < 100) { array[i]; i++; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
For
Foreach
While

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark test cases and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The JSON defines a simple JavaScript microbenchmark that compares three different loops:

1. `for` loop
2. `forEach` loop
3. `while` loop

All three loops aim to iterate over an array of 100 elements, performing some operation on each element (in this case, simply accessing the element using its index).

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code creates a new array with 100 elements:
```javascript
var array = new Array(100);
```
This code is executed before running each test case.

**Html Preparation Code**

There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means that the benchmark only tests the JavaScript engine's performance and does not consider other factors like page rendering or DOM manipulation.

**Test Cases**

The three individual test cases are:

1. `For` loop:
```javascript
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
  array[i];
}
```
This loop uses a traditional `for` loop with an index variable (`i`) and increments it manually.

2. `Foreach` loop:
```javascript
array.forEach(function(i) {
  array[i];
});
```
This loop uses the `forEach` method, which is a built-in array method that iterates over the elements of an array.

3. `While` loop:
```javascript
var i = 0;
while (i < 100) {
  array[i];
  i++;
}
```
This loop uses a traditional `while` loop with an index variable (`i`) and increments it manually.

**Library Used**

None of the test cases use any external libraries or frameworks. The `forEach` method is a built-in JavaScript method that comes with the language.

**Special JS Feature/ Syntax**

None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's described above.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

1. **For Loop**
	* Pros: Easy to understand and implement, minimal overhead.
	* Cons: Can be slower for large arrays due to the need for manual index management.
2. **Foreach Loop**
	* Pros: Convenient and efficient, eliminates the need for manual index management.
	* Cons: May have additional overhead due to the use of a built-in method.
3. **While Loop**
	* Pros: Similar to the `for` loop in terms of control flow, but with more flexibility.
	* Cons: Requires manual index management, which can be error-prone.

**Other Alternatives**

In addition to these three loops, other alternatives for iterating over arrays in JavaScript include:

1. `Array.prototype.map()`
2. `Array.prototype.reduce()`
3. Using `for...of` loop (available in modern browsers and Node.js)

However, these alternatives are not included in the provided benchmark test cases.

**Benchmark Result Interpretation**

The latest benchmark result shows the execution speed for each test case on a Mac OS X 10.15.7 system with Chrome 122 browser:

1. `Foreach` loop: 2434194.25 executions per second
2. `While` loop: 197508.46875 executions per second
3. `For` loop: 100322.9765625 executions per second

The results suggest that the `Foreach` loop is the fastest, followed by the `For` loop, and then the `While` loop. However, the actual performance difference may vary depending on the specific use case and environment.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
For	100323.0 Ops/sec
Foreach	2434194.2 Ops/sec
While	197508.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

For vs Foreach vs While (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: For vs Foreach vs While

Created: 8 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

For

Foreach

While

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):