var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = params.slice();
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ params ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | 91279432.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 68460208.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case that compares two approaches for creating a copy of an array: the traditional Array.prototype.slice()
method and the new ES6 spread operator ([ ...array ]
).
Options compared:
Two options are being compared:
Array.prototype.slice()
: This method returns a shallow copy of a portion of an array, allowing for modifications to be made to the original array without affecting the copied array.[ ...array ]
): This method creates a new array by spreading the elements of the original array.Pros and Cons:
Array.prototype.slice()
:[ ...array ]
):Library:
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that some implementations of the spread operator might use libraries like lodash
for its implementation.
Special JS feature or syntax:
The spread operator ([ ...array ]
) is a relatively recent addition to JavaScript, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for creating new arrays by spreading the elements of an existing array.
Other alternatives:
If you're looking for alternative approaches to create array copies, consider using:
Array.prototype.concat()
(although it's generally slower than both slice()
and the spread operator)lodash
or underscore
, which provide additional utility methods for working with arraysIn conclusion, the provided benchmark test case compares two popular approaches for creating array copies in JavaScript: the traditional Array.prototype.slice()
method and the new ES6 spread operator. The choice of approach depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and compatibility considerations.