Benchmark: [prefix] string.replace vs regex replace

Tests:

replace regex
"this is it".replace(/^this is /, "+");
replace All
"this is it".startsWith('this is ') && "this is it".replace("this is ", "+");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
replace regex
replace All

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmarking setup and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.

**Benchmark Overview**

The test case is comparing two approaches to replace strings in JavaScript:

1. `string.replace()` with a regular expression
2. `startsWith()` followed by `replace()`

**String Replace Method**

`string.replace()` takes three arguments: the pattern to match, the replacement string, and an optional number of occurrences.

Pros:

* Widely supported across different browsers and environments
* Allows for flexible replacement patterns, including capturing groups
* Often faster than regular expression-based approaches

Cons:

* Can be slower for complex replacement patterns due to JavaScript's string manipulation algorithm
* May not work as expected with Unicode characters or edge cases

**Regular Expression Replace Method**

The `String.prototype.replace()` method uses a regular expression (regex) pattern to match and replace strings.

Pros:

* Provides more precise control over the replacement process, including capturing groups and negative lookaheads
* Can be faster for complex patterns due to native regex engine optimizations

Cons:

* May not work as expected with Unicode characters or edge cases
* Requires proper escape sequences and syntax for special regex features

**StartsWith() + Replace Method**

This approach uses the `String.prototype.startsWith()` method to check if the string starts with a certain pattern, followed by the `replace()` method.

Pros:

* Can be faster than regular expression-based approaches due to the simple string comparison
* Allows for easy replacement of multiple substrings

Cons:

* May not work as expected with Unicode characters or edge cases
* Requires careful consideration of the replacement process, including handling null or undefined values

**Library and Special JS Features**

There is no library mentioned in the benchmark setup. However, some JavaScript features used in the benchmarks include:

* `String.prototype.replace()`: a built-in JavaScript method for replacing strings
* `String.prototype.startsWith()`: a built-in JavaScript method for checking if a string starts with a certain pattern
* Regular expressions (regex): used to define patterns for matching and replacing strings

**Other Alternatives**

Some alternative approaches to replace strings in JavaScript include:

* Using `RegExp` objects directly, bypassing the `String.prototype.replace()` method
* Utilizing libraries like `lodash` or `ramda`, which provide optimized string replacement functions
* Leveraging JavaScript engines' built-in optimization techniques, such as `String.prototype.replaceAll()`
* Considering alternative programming languages or frameworks that offer better string manipulation capabilities.

Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:121.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/121.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 121 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
replace regex	6403241.5 Ops/sec
replace All	7166929.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

[prefix] string.replace vs regex replace (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: replace regex vs replace All

Created: 8 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

replace regex

replace All

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):