'alguma coisa espaçada'.replace(/ /g, '-')
'alguma coisa espaçada'.replaceAll(' ', '-')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
String.replace() | |
String.replaceAll() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
String.replace() | 6275024.5 Ops/sec |
String.replaceAll() | 5595674.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two JavaScript methods for replacing spaces in a string: replace()
and replaceAll()
(note that this is a TypeScript method, not JavaScript).
Options Compared
Two approaches are compared:
String.replace()
: This method uses a regular expression to replace all occurrences of a pattern in a string. In this case, the pattern is a space (/ /g
).String.replaceAll()
: This method also uses a regular expression to replace all occurrences of a pattern in a string. However, it's worth noting that replaceAll()
is not a standard JavaScript method; it's more commonly used in other programming languages like Java or C#. In TypeScript, the equivalent method is replace()
.Pros and Cons
String.replace()
: Pros:String.replaceAll()
(TypeScript): Pros:Library and Purpose
There is no library explicitly mentioned in the JSON, but it's worth noting that both String.replace()
and String.replaceAll()
rely on the browser's or engine's implementation of regular expressions. If you're interested in using a dedicated regex library, you can explore options like jsregex
or regexpr
.
Special JS Feature
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in the JSON.
Other Considerations
When writing benchmarks, it's essential to consider factors like:
replace()
or replaceAll()
?Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, consider:
jsregex
or regexpr
to implement regular expressions.String.prototype.split()
and join()
.