<div id="foo"></div>
const x = window.getComputedStyle(document.getElementById('foo')).width
const x = document.getElementById('foo').getBoundingClientRect().width;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
getComputedStyle | |
getBoundingClientRect |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
getComputedStyle | 560075.1 Ops/sec |
getBoundingClientRect | 839326.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: window.getComputedStyle
and getBoundingClientRect
. The goal is to determine which method is faster for retrieving the width of an element using a specific HTML structure.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
window.getComputedStyle
: This method retrieves the computed style properties of an element, including its width.getBoundingClientRect
: This method returns the size and position of an element relative to the viewport.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
window.getComputedStyle
:getBoundingClientRect
:getComputedStyle
Library Usage
There is no explicit library usage in this benchmark. However, the document.getElementById
and window.getComputedStyle
methods are part of the standard JavaScript API.
Special JS Features or Syntax
None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark.
Other Considerations
getBoundingClientRect
and 560,075 times per second for getComputedStyle
.Alternatives
If you want to explore alternative approaches or libraries for measuring performance in JavaScript, here are some options:
requestAnimationFrame
: This method allows you to schedule a callback function to be executed at the next available opportunity on the browser's event queue.Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on your specific use case and requirements.