<div id="test">test</div>
var test_n = '123px';
var _style = window.getComputedStyle(document.getElementById('test'));
document.getElementById('test').offsetwidth;
document.getElementById('test').getBoundingClientRect;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
offsetwidth | |
getBoundingClientRect |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
offsetwidth | 22256518.0 Ops/sec |
getBoundingClientRect | 22775594.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark compares the performance of two methods to measure the width of an element: offsetWidth
and getBoundingClientRect
. The goal is to determine which method is faster.
Options Compared:
Two options are being compared:
window.getComputedStyle(document.getElementById('test'))
). This approach can be slower because it involves an additional DOM lookup.offsetWidth
because it only requires a single DOM query to access the element's style.Pros and Cons:
getBoundingClientRect
because it involves two steps (DOM lookup and style access).offsetWidth
since it only requires a single DOM query. It also provides more information about the element's bounding rectangle, including its width.Library and Its Purpose:
In this benchmark, the window.getComputedStyle
function is used to access the style of an element. This library provides a way to retrieve an element's computed styles (e.g., position, width, height) in a single step.
Special JS Feature or Syntax:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested or utilized in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives:
If you need to measure the width of an element, other alternatives to offsetWidth
and getBoundingClientRect
include:
offsetWidth
, but only returns the width of the content within the element's border, not including padding or margin.property: Some browsers (e.g., Edge) provide a
width` property on the element object itself, which can be used to measure the element's width.Keep in mind that each approach has its pros and cons, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.