Benchmark: test b@b regexp list inverted

Tests:

regexp of list
new RegExp("(^([^./]+\\.)*slack\\.com/)|(^([^./]+\\.)*microsoft\\.com/)|(^([^./]+\\.)*beamy\\.io/)").test("sub1.sub2.slack.com/");
list of regexps
new RegExp("^([^./]+\\.)*slack\\.com/").test("sub1.sub2.slack.com/"); new RegExp("^([^./]+\\.)*microsoft\\.com/").test("sub1.sub2.slack.com/"); new RegExp("^([^./]+\\.)*beamy\\.io/").test("sub1.sub2.slack.com/");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
regexp of list
list of regexps

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to explain the benchmark being tested on MeasureThat.net.

**What is tested?**

The benchmark tests the performance of different approaches for regular expression (RegExp) matching in JavaScript. The test cases involve creating and executing multiple Regexps with varying patterns against a fixed input string ("sub1.sub2.slack.com/").

**Options compared:**

There are two main options being compared:

1. **Single RegExp**: This approach creates a single RegExp object with multiple patterns separated by pipes (`|`). The `test()` method is called for each pattern, and the resulting matches are not collected.
2. **List of Regexps**: This approach creates multiple separate RegExp objects, one for each pattern in the list. Each `test()` method call is executed individually.

**Pros and Cons:**

1. **Single RegExp**:
	* Pros:
		+ Reduced memory allocation and garbage collection overhead since only a single object needs to be created.
		+ Potential for faster execution if the patterns are closely related (e.g., shared prefix or suffix).
	* Cons:
		+ Increased complexity due to multiple pattern testing in a single `test()` call.
		+ May lead to slower performance if the patterns are not optimized or if there are many patterns.
2. **List of Regexps**:
	* Pros:
		+ Simplified code and easier maintenance, as each RegExp is separate and distinct.
		+ Easier to optimize individual patterns for better performance.
	* Cons:
		+ Higher memory allocation and garbage collection overhead since multiple objects need to be created.
		+ Slower execution due to the overhead of creating and disposing RegExp objects.

**Library usage:**

There is no explicit library usage in these test cases. However, it's likely that the JavaScript engine being tested (e.g., V8) provides its own implementation of Regexps, which might include internal optimizations or complexities not visible in this benchmark.

**Special JS features or syntax:**

There are no special JS features or syntax used in these test cases. The focus is on the RegExp matching performance and optimization.

**Alternative approaches:**

Other alternatives for regular expression matching in JavaScript include:

1. **Using a string replacement library**: Instead of creating Regexps, libraries like String.prototype.replace() can be used to perform string replacements.
2. **Regular expression caching**: Some JavaScript engines provide caching mechanisms for frequently used Regexps, which can improve performance.
3. **Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation**: Some JavaScript engines use JIT compilation to optimize RegExp execution at runtime.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might not directly address the specific question of optimal RegExp matching approach but rather offer additional optimization techniques or alternatives for string manipulation tasks.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 9 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
regexp of list	3621568.0 Ops/sec
list of regexps	2036345.8 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

test b@b regexp list inverted (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: regexp of list vs list of regexps

Created: 9 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

regexp of list

list of regexps

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):