/^(00[0-9]|0[1-9][0-9]|10[0-9]|11[01])/.test(110)
/^([0][0-9][0-9]|[0-1][0][0-9]|[0-1][0-1][0-1])/.test(110)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
regex 1 | |
regex2 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
regex 1 | 17931940.0 Ops/sec |
regex2 | 18168362.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help explain the provided benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark tests two different regular expression (regex) patterns using JavaScript's built-in test()
function. A regular expression is a pattern used to match character combinations in strings. In this case, the benchmark is comparing the performance of two regex patterns:
/^(00[0-9]|0[1-9][0-9]|10[0-9]|11[01])/.test(110)
/^([0][0-9][0-9]|[0-1][0][0-9]|[0-1][0-1][0-1])/.test(110)
Options compared
The benchmark is comparing the performance of these two regex patterns. The main difference between the two patterns lies in the way they match digits:
Pattern 1: 00[0-9]|0[1-9][0-9]|10[0-9]|11[01]
Pattern 2: ([0][0-9][0-9]|[0-1][0][0-9]|[0-1][0-1][0-1])
Pros and cons
The pros and cons of each approach are:
Pattern 1 (more complex regex):
Pros:
Cons:
Pattern 2 (less complex regex):
Pros:
Cons:
Library usage
Neither of the provided benchmarks uses any external libraries. However, if you were to add a library, some options could include:
regex-construct
: A lightweight regex testing library for Node.jsregex-tester
: A simple regex testing library that allows you to define multiple test cases and run themSpecial JavaScript features or syntax
None of the provided benchmarks use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond regular expressions.
Alternatives
Other alternatives for creating benchmark tests include:
benchmark.js
or fast-bench
provide a simple way to write and compare benchmarks.jsperf
, Speedometer
, or PerfHog
offer built-in support for writing and running benchmarks, often with the ability to visualize results in real-time.I hope this explanation helps!