var test = Array.from({ length: 10000 }, (_, index) => ({ id: index + 1, value: Math.random() }))
test.slice(1)
test.filter((e, i) => i !== 0 )
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
filter |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 2033054.4 Ops/sec |
filter | 34609.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation.
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The test measures the performance of two different approaches to remove the first element from an array: using the slice()
method and the filter()
function.
Approaches compared:
slice()
: This method returns a new array that includes all elements except the first one. It creates a new array object with the specified length, and then fills it with elements from the original array.filter()
: This method creates a new array with all elements that pass the provided test. In this case, the filter function checks if the index i
is not equal to 0.Pros and Cons:
slice()
:filter()
:slice()
, especially for large arrays.The choice between these two approaches depends on the specific use case and performance requirements. If memory efficiency is crucial, filter()
might be a better option. However, if raw speed is essential, slice()
might be preferred.
Library usage:
None of the provided code snippet uses any external libraries for this test case.
Special JavaScript features or syntax:
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark.
Now, let's consider some alternative approaches:
slice()
and filter()
methods further by implementing them from scratch. This approach requires more expertise in JavaScript internals and can lead to a significant increase in development time.These alternatives are worth considering when dealing with performance-critical array operations in JavaScript.