Benchmark: Get file extension (String v.s. Regex)

Script Preparation code:

// There are 100 more files
var filePaths = new Array(250).fill('').map(() =>
  (crypto.randomUUID() + crypto.randomUUID())
    .slice(0, 32)
    .replace(/c/g, '.')
    .replace(/(0|9|a)/g, '/'),
);
var fileExt;

Tests:

String.split
for (const path of filePaths) { const args = path.split('.'); fileExt = args[args.length - 1]; }
String.split (one-liner, mutation)
for (const path of filePaths) { fileExt = path.split('.').pop(); }
Regex.exec
for (const path of filePaths) { fileExt = /\.([^\.]+)$/.exec(path)?.[1]; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
String.split
String.split (one-liner, mutation)
Regex.exec

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark tests three different ways to extract the file extension from a path and name:

1. `String.split()`: Using the built-in string method `split()` with a dot (`.`) as the separator.
2. `String.split (one-liner, mutation)`: A one-liner version of the previous approach, which is likely optimized for performance by using a single call to `split()` and then extracting the last element of the resulting array.
3. `Regex.exec()`: Using regular expressions to extract the file extension from the path.

**Comparison of options**

1. **`String.split()`**: This method uses a simple string splitting approach, which can be efficient but may not always produce the correct result (e.g., if the path contains multiple consecutive dots).
	* Pros: Easy to implement and understand.
	* Cons: May not be as performant as other methods, especially for large inputs.
2. **`String.split (one-liner, mutation)`**: This approach uses a single call to `split()` followed by an array manipulation to extract the last element of the resulting array.
	* Pros: Optimized for performance and concise implementation.
	* Cons: May be less readable than other approaches, especially for those not familiar with array manipulation.
3. **`Regex.exec()`**: This method uses regular expressions to match the file extension against a pattern.
	* Pros: Highly flexible and powerful, but may also be slower due to the overhead of regex compilation.

**Library used**

None of the test cases explicitly use any external libraries beyond JavaScript's built-in functions (`String.split()`, `Array.map()`).

**Special JS features or syntax**

There are no explicit mentions of special JavaScript features or syntax in the benchmark code. However, the `crypto` module is used to generate random UUIDs for the file paths.

**Benchmark preparation code explanation**

The script generation code creates an array of 250 randomly generated file paths, each consisting of two parts separated by a dot (`.`). The `replace()` method is used to replace certain characters in the path with dots (`.`) and slashes (`/`) to create a realistic file system structure. This allows for testing different file extension extraction approaches on various input scenarios.

**Other alternatives**

If you were to test alternative file extension extraction methods, some options might include:

* Using `path.basename()` and `path.extname()` from the Node.js `path` module
* Implementing a custom function to extract the file extension using arithmetic operations or string manipulation
* Using a library like `file-type` (a dependency of Node.js) that provides a simple way to determine the file type and extension

Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be directly comparable to the original test cases, as they might introduce additional dependencies or change the input data.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
String.split	23269.8 Ops/sec
String.split (one-liner, mutation)	23581.4 Ops/sec
Regex.exec	26574.6 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Get file extension (String v.s. Regex) (version: 0)

Get file extension from path and name

Comparing performance of: String.split vs String.split (one-liner, mutation) vs Regex.exec

Created: 10 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

String.split

String.split (one-liner, mutation)

Regex.exec

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):