var text = '/test/abcd/'
text.split('/').filter(s => s)
text.match(/([^/]+)\/?$/)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
get last element of path: split | |
get last element of path: regex |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
get last element of path: split | 1665321.8 Ops/sec |
get last element of path: regex | 2241349.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested and compared in this benchmark.
Benchmark Name: "Get Last Element of Path: Split vs Regex"
What is being tested: The benchmark compares two different approaches to extracting the last element from a path string using JavaScript. A path string can be something like "/test/abcd/" or "/path/to/file.txt".
Test Case 1: "get last element of path: split"
In this test case, the benchmark uses the split()
method to divide the path string into an array of substrings, separated by slashes ("/"
). It then filters out any empty strings using the filter()
method and returns the last non-empty string in the array.
Example code:
text.split('/').filter(s => s)
Test Case 2: "get last element of path: regex"
In this test case, the benchmark uses a regular expression (/([^\/]+)\/?$/
) to match the last element from the path string. The regular expression breaks down as follows:
([^\/]+)
matches one or more characters that are not slashes ("/"
), capturing them in a group.\/*
matches an optional slash at the end of the string (i.e., it's followed by zero or more slashes).$
asserts that the match must be at the end of the string.The regular expression returns the captured group, which is the last element from the path string.
Example code:
text.match(/([^\/]+)\/?$/)
What are we comparing?
We're comparing two different approaches to achieving the same result: extracting the last element from a path string. The two test cases use distinct methods:
split()
and filter()
: These methods are part of the JavaScript Array prototype and are used to manipulate arrays./regex/i
): This method is also a built-in JavaScript feature that allows for complex pattern matching.Pros and Cons:
Other Considerations:
When choosing between these approaches, consider the following:
split()
and filter()
might be the way to go.Library Usage: None in this benchmark.