nums = [];
let i = 10 ** 5;
while (--i > 0) nums.push(i);
new Int32Array(nums).sort();
nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Int32Array.sort | |
Array.sort |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Int32Array.sort | 4538.8 Ops/sec |
Array.sort | 1089.3 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark tests two approaches for sorting an array of integers:
Int32Array.sort()
: This method uses the built-in JavaScript Array interface to sort the array.nums.sort((a, b) => a - b)
: This approach also uses the built-in JavaScript Array interface, but it uses a custom comparison function to compare elements.Options being compared
The two options being compared are:
Int32Array
objects for sortingnums
) with a custom comparison functionPros and Cons of each approach:
Int32Array
is a typed array that can store 32-bit integers, which may lead to fewer allocations and better cache locality.Int32Array
to handle.Library usage
The Int32Array
class is part of the JavaScript Standard Library, which means it's a built-in feature that comes bundled with every JavaScript engine. The purpose of Int32Array
is to provide a typed array that can store 32-bit integers.
Special JS features or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. Both approaches use standard JavaScript language elements and built-ins.
Other alternatives
If you're looking for alternative sorting algorithms, there are several options available:
These algorithms may have different performance characteristics and use cases compared to Int32Array.sort()
and nums.sort((a, b) => a - b)
.
In summary, this benchmark compares two approaches for sorting arrays: using Int32Array
objects or regular arrays with a custom comparison function. The choice of approach depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your use case.