nums = [];
let i = 10 ** 3;
while (--i > 0) nums.push(i);
new Int32Array(nums).sort();
nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Int32Array.sort | |
Array.sort |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Int32Array.sort | 426208.1 Ops/sec |
Array.sort | 112644.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its results.
What is being tested?
The test case compares two approaches to sort an array of 10,000 integers: using the Int32Array
constructor and calling its sort()
method, versus using the native Array
class and its sort()
method with a compare function.
Options compared
The two options are:
Int32Array
constructor to create an array of 32-bit integers, which is then sorted in-place using the sort()
method.Array
class and its sort()
method with a compare function that subtracts two values.Pros and cons
Here's a brief overview of each approach:
Array.prototype.sort()
uses the Timsort algorithm.Int32Array
wouldn't work, such as when dealing with strings or objects that need to be compared using a custom logic.Library usage
The test case uses the Int32Array
constructor and its sort()
method, which is part of the ECMAScript standard. No additional libraries are required.
Special JS feature or syntax
There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark that would require specific knowledge or implementation details.
Other alternatives
To test similar scenarios, you could consider:
NativeArray
(also known as Native Integer32Array) constructor and its sort()
method might provide more comparable results to Int32Array.sort()
.Float64Array
, Set
, or Map
, could provide insights into how sorting performance varies across different types of collections.Overall, this benchmark provides a good starting point for understanding the relative performance differences between using Int32Array
and native Array
methods for sorting arrays in JavaScript.