<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var jq331 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.4/jquery.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var jq214 = $.noConflict(true);
</script>
<div id="testElement"></div>
var el = jq331("#testElement")[0];
var className = el.className;
var el = jq214("#testElement")[0];
var className = el.className;
var el = document.querySelector('#testElement');
var className = el.className;
var el = document.getElementById('testElement');
var className = el.className;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jQuery 3.3.1 | |
jQuery 2.1.4 | |
Vanilla JS querySelector | |
Vanilla JS getElementById |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jQuery 3.3.1 | 2504471.5 Ops/sec |
jQuery 2.1.4 | 2203487.2 Ops/sec |
Vanilla JS querySelector | 2685071.0 Ops/sec |
Vanilla JS getElementById | 15243521.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test for comparing the performance of four different methods to retrieve an HTML element and its class name:
$.fn
API to select an element based on its ID.querySelector
function provided by modern web browsers (specifically, those that support CSS selectors).getElementById
function to retrieve an element based on its ID.Options Comparison:
The four options are compared in terms of their execution speed, measured in executions per second (EPS). The benchmark result shows the EPS for each option:
Pros and Cons:
Here's a brief overview of the pros and cons for each approach:
Library:
The $.noConflict(true)
calls are used to mitigate issues with multiple jQuery versions running simultaneously. This allows the benchmark to use different versions of jQuery while minimizing potential conflicts.
Special JS Feature or Syntax:
None of the options in this benchmark rely on any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is supported by modern browsers.
Other Alternatives:
If you need alternative methods for retrieving an element and its class name, consider:
querySelector
or getElementById
, use querySelectorByClassName
. However, this method has a slightly higher overhead due to the additional function call.document.querySelectorAll
to retrieve all elements with a specific class name. This approach can be more suitable for projects requiring optimal performance but may return an array of elements instead of a single one.Keep in mind that the choice of method ultimately depends on your project's requirements, your team's expertise, and your personal preference.