<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
<div id="testElement"></div>
var el = $("#testElement")[0];
var className = el.className;
var el = document.querySelector('#testElement');
var className = el.className;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jQuery 3.3.1 | |
Vanilla JS |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jQuery 3.3.1 | 4492952.5 Ops/sec |
Vanilla JS | 2641399.8 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of jQuery 3.3.1 selector and vanilla JavaScript querySelector on two test cases. The goal is to determine which approach is faster for retrieving the class name of an HTML element.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
Pros and Cons
Library: jQuery
jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies HTML element manipulation. The $(selector)
function uses a proprietary selector engine to match elements in the DOM tree. In this benchmark, jQuery 3.3.1 selector is used to select an element with the class name "testElement".
Special JS Feature: None
This benchmark does not utilize any special JavaScript features or syntax.
Other Considerations
When choosing between jQuery and vanilla JavaScript querySelector, consider the trade-off between convenience and performance. If you need a simple way to manipulate elements in your application, jQuery might be a good choice. However, if you prioritize performance and are willing to invest time in learning CSS selectors, vanilla JavaScript querySelector is likely a better option.
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, consider the following:
elementAt
method.Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific use case and requirements.