<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var MyObject = {
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"isStudent": false,
"address": {
"street": "123 Main St",
"city": "Anytown",
"zipcode": "12345"
},
"contacts": [
{
"type": "email",
"value": "john.doe@example.com"
},
{
"type": "phone",
"value": "+1 123-456-7890"
}
],
"skills": {
"programming": ["JavaScript", "Python", "Java"],
"design": ["Photoshop", "Illustrator"],
"languages": {
"spoken": ["English", "Spanish"],
"written": ["English", "French"]
}
},
"isActive": true,
"projects": [
{
"name": "Project A",
"status": "completed",
"team": ["Alice", "Bob"]
},
{
"name": "Project B",
"status": "in progress",
"team": ["Charlie", "David"]
}
]
};
var myCopy = null;
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
myCopy = {MyObject};
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash cloneDeep | |
Spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash cloneDeep | 243676.7 Ops/sec |
Spread operator | 10935871.0 Ops/sec |
Measuring the performance of JavaScript microbenchmarks can be a complex task, and understanding what's being tested is crucial to grasping the results.
Benchmark Definition
The provided benchmark tests two approaches:
_.cloneDeep
method from Lodash, a popular JavaScript utility library, to create a deep copy of the MyObject
object....
) is used to create a shallow copy of the MyObject
object.What's being tested
Both tests aim to measure how long it takes for each approach to create a new object that is a copy of MyObject
. However, there are key differences between the two:
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Library: Lodash
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides various helper functions for tasks like array manipulation, object creation, and more. The _.cloneDeep
method is one of its most useful functions, as it allows you to create an exact copy of any object.
In the context of this benchmark, using Lodash's cloneDeep
method can be beneficial if you need a precise copy of an object for testing or development purposes.
Other Considerations
When deciding which approach to use, consider the specific requirements of your project. If you're working with large datasets or complex objects, using the spread operator might not provide the desired results due to its shallow copying nature. However, if most of your nested properties are simple values (e.g., strings, numbers), the spread operator can be a suitable choice.
Alternative approaches
Some alternative methods for creating copies of JavaScript objects include:
Object.assign()
with an empty objectObject.create()
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))
, which creates a deep copy but is not available in all browsersKeep in mind that each approach has its trade-offs, and some might be more suitable for your specific use case than others.