<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var obj = {
description: 'a',
myNumber: 123456789,
myBoolean: true,
};
var array = [obj, obj, obj];
result = _.cloneDeep(array);
result = [array];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash cloneDeep | |
Spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash cloneDeep | 642156.4 Ops/sec |
Spread operator | 3886032.8 Ops/sec |
Measuring the performance of JavaScript code is essential to optimize and improve application performance. In this benchmark, we're comparing three approaches for creating a deep copy of an array of objects using Lodash or the spread operator.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark tests two individual test cases:
cloneDeep
function.Library Used: Lodash
The spread operator uses the lodash
library, which provides various utility functions for JavaScript development, including array manipulation and cloning. The specific version used in this benchmark is 4.17.5.
Options Compared
Here's a summary of the options compared:
cloneDeep
function.Special JavaScript Features
This benchmark uses:
...
) in JavaScript is called the "spread syntax" and allows for creating new arrays from existing ones by copying its elements into a new array.cloneDeep
function to create deep copies of objects, preserving their entire structure and nested content.Other Alternatives
If you prefer not to use the spread operator or Lodash for creating copies, there are alternative methods:
Object.assign()
to populate it.map()
to create a new array and then use Object.assign()
to populate the array from the original data.In summary, Lodash's cloneDeep
provides a safe way for deep copying objects, while the spread operator offers an efficient solution for shallow copying arrays. Choosing between these options depends on the specific requirements of your project and whether you need to preserve nested structures or simply create copies without affecting the original data.