<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
window.foo = ['cat', 'dog', 'bird'];
window.bar = ['cat', 'dog', 'bird', 'notEqual'];
_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)
JSON.stringify(window.foo) === JSON.stringify(window.bar);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.isEqual | |
JSON.stringify |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.isEqual | 4726971.5 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 1798203.6 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark test cases and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered.
Benchmark Overview
The test measures the performance of two equality comparison approaches: Lodash's isEqual
function and the direct comparison using JSON.stringify
.
Approaches Compared
isEqual
function: This approach uses a library (Lodash) to perform an equality comparison on arrays. The isEqual
function checks if the elements in both arrays are equal, considering data types, numbers, dates, and objects.JSON.stringify
: This approach compares two arrays by converting them into JSON strings and then comparing these strings for equality.Pros and Cons
Lodash's isEqual
function:
Pros:
Cons:
Direct Comparison using JSON.stringify
:
Pros:
Cons:
Library: Lodash
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a set of functional programming helpers. In this case, the isEqual
function is used for equality comparison on arrays. Other common uses of Lodash include array manipulation, object merging, and functional programming techniques.
Special JS Feature or Syntax: None
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these benchmark test cases.
Other Alternatives
If you need to compare arrays for equality without using a library like Lodash, you could use built-in JavaScript methods such as every()
or some()
, along with manual handling of data types and edge cases. Another approach would be to implement your own custom comparison function.
For more complex scenarios, other libraries like Immutable.js or functional programming frameworks like Ramda might be suitable alternatives.
Keep in mind that performance comparisons should consider the trade-offs between readability, maintainability, and performance, depending on the specific use case.