<script>
class TestClass {
a = 0;
b = 0;
constructor() {
this.a = 2;
}
get GetA() {
return this.a;
}
GetB() {
return this.b;
}
}
</script>
var obj = new TestClass();
obj instanceof TestClass;
obj.constructor === TestClass;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Instanceof | |
Constructor comparison |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Instanceof | 115332504.0 Ops/sec |
Constructor comparison | 625072000.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Test Cases:
The test consists of two individual test cases:
obj instanceof TestClass;
(Instanceof)obj.constructor === TestClass;
(Constructor comparison)Options being compared:
In both test cases, we're comparing the execution time or performance between two approaches:
Pros and Cons of each approach:
constructor comparison
due to differences in how they're implemented internally.instanceof
due to additional overhead from the comparison operation.Library used:
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or script preparation code. However, the use of a custom class (TestClass
) suggests that it's a JavaScript-specific implementation detail.
Special JS feature/syntax:
The benchmark uses JavaScript classes and their methods (constructor
, GetA
, and GetB
). There are no special JavaScript features like async/await, arrow functions, or modern syntax elements mentioned in the code. The focus is on testing basic class-based object creation and comparison.
Other alternatives:
If you need to compare execution times for other scenarios, here are some potential alternatives:
obj.hasOwnProperty('property')
) instead of using instanceof.typeof
operator or the instanceof
method on a prototype chain instead of directly comparing constructors.Keep in mind that these alternatives might introduce additional overhead, complexity, or implementation-specific differences, which could affect benchmark results.