var obj = {a: 'val1'};
typeof(obj) === 'object'
obj && obj.constructor === Object
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
typeof | |
constructor |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
typeof | 12532875.0 Ops/sec |
constructor | 3333474.8 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is a JSON object that defines the overall characteristics of the benchmark. In this case, it specifies:
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code is a JavaScript snippet that initializes the test data before running the benchmark. In this case, it creates an object obj
with a single property a
containing the string 'val1'
.
Html Preparation Code
There is no HTML preparation code specified in this benchmark.
Individual Test Cases
The benchmark consists of two individual test cases:
This test case uses the typeof
operator to check if obj
is an object. The benchmark definition is typeof(obj) === 'object'
.
Pros:
Cons:
Test Case 2: "constructor"
This test case uses the constructor
property of obj
to check if it is an object. The benchmark definition is (a => {}).constructor === Object
.
Pros:
typeof
, as it accounts for non-standard objects and arraysCons:
typeof
test caseLibrary: Function Expression
In both test cases, a function expression is used to create an anonymous object obj
. The purpose of this library is to provide a way to create objects dynamically using a concise syntax.
Special JS Feature/Syntax: No special features or syntax are mentioned in the benchmark definition.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to run this benchmark, you would need to:
In conclusion, the "typeof" test case is simple but may not work correctly in all scenarios. The "constructor" test case is more accurate but less concise and potentially more complex. The function expression library used in both test cases provides a convenient way to create objects dynamically.