Benchmark: Access Object Property vs Global Let vs Private Let

Script Preparation code:

const array = Array(1000);
for (let arr of array)
    arr = Math.random(10);

const obj = {
    a: 0,
    b: 0,
}
var ofunc = () => {
    for (let arr of array) {
        obj.a += arr;
        obj.b += obj.a + arr;
    }
}

let ga = 0;
let gb = 0;
var gfunc = () => {
    for (let arr of array) {
        ga += arr;
        gb += ga + arr;
    }
}

var pfunc = (() => {
    let a = 0;
    let b = 0;
    return () => {
        for (let arr of array) {
            a += arr;
            b += a + arr;
        }
    }
})();

Tests:

Object
ofunc();
Global Let
gfunc();
Private Let
pfunc();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Object
Global Let
Private Let

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Overview of the Benchmark**

The provided benchmark compares three different approaches to accessing an object's property:

1. **Direct Access**: `obj.a += arr;` and `obj.b += obj.a + arr;`
2. **Global Variable**: `ga += arr;` and `gb += ga + arr;`
3. **Private Variable** (using Immediately Invoked Function Expression, IIFE): `a += arr;` and `b += a + arr;`

The benchmark measures the execution time of each approach.

**Approaches Compared**

1. **Direct Access**: This approach accesses the object's property directly using dot notation (`obj.a`) or bracket notation (`obj.b`). This is the most straightforward way to access an object's property.
2. **Global Variable**: In this approach, two global variables `ga` and `gb` are used to store the cumulative values. The `gfunc` function updates these global variables in each iteration of the loop. This approach uses a global variable, which can lead to naming conflicts or unexpected behavior if not managed carefully.
3. **Private Variable** (using IIFE): In this approach, an IIFE is used to create a private scope for the variables `a` and `b`. The `pfunc` function returns another function that updates these private variables in each iteration of the loop. This approach uses a private variable, which can help encapsulate data and avoid global variable pollution.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Direct Access**
	* Pros: straightforward, easy to understand
	* Cons: may not be optimal due to object property lookup overhead
2. **Global Variable**
	* Pros: simple, easy to implement
	* Cons: uses a global variable, which can lead to naming conflicts or unexpected behavior
3. **Private Variable** (using IIFE)
	* Pros: encapsulates data, avoids global variable pollution
	* Cons: more complex setup, may require additional setup for the IIFE

**Library and Special JavaScript Features**

In this benchmark, no libraries are used, but some special JavaScript features are employed:

1. **Immediately Invoked Function Expression (IIFE)**: An IIFE is used to create a private scope for the variables `a` and `b`. This feature helps encapsulate data and avoid global variable pollution.
2. **Arrow Functions**: The `pfunc` function uses an arrow function, which is a concise way to define small functions without declaring them with `function`.

**Other Alternatives**

If you need to optimize object property access, consider the following alternatives:

1. **Using a cache**: If the object's properties are not changing frequently, using a cache to store the results of previous accesses can help reduce overhead.
2. **Using a specialized library**: Libraries like Lodash or Ramda provide optimized functions for common data manipulation tasks, including object property access.
3. **Compiling to native code**: Compilers like V8 (used by Chrome) or SpiderMonkey (used by Firefox) can optimize JavaScript code for performance, but this requires significant expertise and resources.

Keep in mind that the best approach depends on your specific use case, data characteristics, and performance requirements.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/117.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 117 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Object	176513.9 Ops/sec
Global Let	40450.6 Ops/sec
Private Let	39998.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Access Object Property vs Global Let vs Private Let (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Object vs Global Let vs Private Let

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Object

Global Let

Private Let

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):