const arr = new Array(100000).fill(0).map(Math.random);
arr.slice();
const arr = new Array(100000).fill(0).map(Math.random);
[arr];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Slice | |
Spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Slice | 706.1 Ops/sec |
Spread | 249.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Goal
The benchmark aims to compare two different methods for cloning an array: using the slice()
method and using the spread operator ([...]
).
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
slice()
method to clone an array.[...]
) to clone an array.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
slice()
.slice()
due to the overhead of creating a new array.Library
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's likely that the JavaScript engine being tested (e.g., V8 in Chrome) implements these methods as part of its internal library.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
Neither of the tested approaches uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require additional explanation.
Alternatives
If you wanted to test alternative array cloning methods, some possible alternatives could include:
slice()
on an existing array.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide the same performance characteristics as slice()
and the spread operator, depending on the specific use case and browser implementation.
Overall, this benchmark provides a simple yet informative comparison of two common array cloning methods in JavaScript, which can help identify performance differences between older and modern browsers.