Benchmark: montest - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomElement(id) {
  return {
    id,
    a: Math.random(),
    b: Math.random(),
    c: Math.random(),
  }
}

function getArray(length) {
  const result = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
    result.push(getRandomElement(i))
  }
  
  return result;
}

function arrayToMap(array) {
  return new Map(array.map(el => [el.id, el]));
}

function cloneArray(array) {
  return [...array];
}

function cloneMap(map) {
  return new Map(map);
}

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * max);
}

array_small = getArray(3);
array_large = getArray(10);

map_small = arrayToMap(array_small);
map_large = arrayToMap(array_large);

Tests:

Array.find, 3 elements
const target = getRandomInt(2); array_small.find(el => el.id === target);
Map.get, 3 elements
const target = getRandomInt(2); map_small.get(target);
Array.find, 10 elements
const target = getRandomInt(9); array_large.find(el => el.id === target);
Map.get, 10 elements
const target = getRandomInt(9); map_large.get(target)
Clone array 3
const array = cloneArray(array_small);
Clone map 3
const map = cloneMap(map_small);
Clone array 10
const array = cloneArray(array_large);
Clone map 10
const map = cloneMap(map_large);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.find, 3 elements
Map.get, 3 elements
Array.find, 10 elements
Map.get, 10 elements
Clone array 3
Clone map 3
Clone array 10
Clone map 10

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what is being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition json contains several functions that are used to generate test cases:

1. `getRandomElement(id)`: generates a random object with three properties (`a`, `b`, and `c`) for each `id` passed as an argument.
2. `getArray(length)`: creates an array of length `length` by pushing random objects generated by `getRandomElement(i)` into the array.
3. `arrayToMap(array)`: converts an array to a Map by mapping each object in the array to a key-value pair in the Map, where the key is the `id` property of the object and the value is the object itself.
4. `cloneArray(array)`: creates a shallow copy of the input array by spreading its elements into a new array.
5. `cloneMap(map)`: creates a shallow copy of the input Map by spreading its key-value pairs into a new Map.

**Individual Test Cases**

Each test case is a simple benchmark that exercises one of these functions:

1. **Array.find**: finds an element in the `array_small` array that matches the condition specified in the `Benchmark Definition`. In this case, it's finding an object with `id === target`, where `target` is a random integer between 0 and 2.
2. **Map.get**: retrieves a value from the `map_small` Map using the key-value pair specified in the `Benchmark Definition`.
3. **Clone array**: creates a copy of the `array_small` array by calling `cloneArray(array_small)`.
4. **Clone map**: creates a copy of the `map_small` Map by calling `cloneMap(map_small)`.

**Performance Comparison**

The benchmark measures the execution time of each test case across multiple runs, with different random targets for each element in the arrays and maps. This allows the benchmark to accurately compare the performance characteristics of each function under various conditions.

**Interpretation**

Based on the results, we can see that:

* `array.find` is generally the slowest operation, likely due to the need to iterate through the array and find a matching element.
* `map.get` is faster than `array.find`, possibly because Maps provide faster lookup times.
* `cloneArray` and `cloneMap` are relatively fast operations, as they only require creating a new array or Map with existing data.

Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison of the performance characteristics of these three functions, which can help developers choose the best approach for their specific use case.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/119.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/119.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 119 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array.find, 3 elements	1176284.6 Ops/sec
Map.get, 3 elements	1132418.9 Ops/sec
Array.find, 10 elements	685130.9 Ops/sec
Map.get, 10 elements	969429.2 Ops/sec
Clone array 3	2325328.5 Ops/sec
Clone map 3	1150065.5 Ops/sec
Clone array 10	2323130.5 Ops/sec
Clone map 10	554955.6 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

montest (version: 0)

montest

Comparing performance of: Array.find, 3 elements vs Map.get, 3 elements vs Array.find, 10 elements vs Map.get, 10 elements vs Clone array 3 vs Clone map 3 vs Clone array 10 vs Clone map 10

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array.find, 3 elements

Map.get, 3 elements

Array.find, 10 elements

Map.get, 10 elements

Clone array 3

Clone map 3

Clone array 10

Clone map 10

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):