Benchmark: sort vs reduce - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var a=Array.from({length:100},()=>Math.random())

Tests:

sort
var b = a.slice(); b.sort();
reduce
a.reduce((a,c) => a < c ? a : c)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
sort
reduce

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: sorting an array using the `sort()` method and reducing an array to find its minimum value using the `reduce()` method.

**Options Compared**

The two options being compared are:

1. **Sort**: This involves calling the `sort()` method on the original array (`a`) to sort it in ascending order.
2. **Reduce**: This involves using the `reduce()` method to iterate through the array and find the smallest value.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

**Sort:**

Pros:

* Simple and straightforward implementation
* Well-documented and widely supported

Cons:

* Can be slow for large datasets due to its O(n log n) time complexity
* May cause unnecessary reordering of elements, especially for already sorted arrays

**Reduce:**

Pros:

* More efficient for large datasets (O(n)) since it only iterates through the array once
* Less memory-intensive than sorting, as it doesn't create a new sorted array

Cons:

* Requires more complex implementation and understanding of the `reduce()` method
* May not be as intuitive or widely supported as the `sort()` method

**Other Considerations**

The benchmark is running on a Mac OS X 10.15.7 desktop environment with Chrome 129, which might affect the results.

**Library Used (if any)**

None mentioned in the provided code snippets. However, if you're familiar with JavaScript libraries like Lodash or Ramda, they provide similar functionality for array manipulation and sorting/reducing.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There's no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark that would require specific expertise to understand.

**Other Alternatives**

If you were to create a similar benchmark, you could consider adding other approaches, such as:

* Using a custom sorting algorithm (e.g., insertion sort)
* Employing parallel processing to compare the performance of both methods
* Incorporating modern JavaScript features like async/await or Promises to optimize the testing process

Keep in mind that these alternatives would require significant modifications to the benchmark code and might not be relevant to this specific comparison.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: yesterday)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 130 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
sort	97519.9 Ops/sec
reduce	8512043.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

sort vs reduce (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: sort vs reduce

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

sort

reduce

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):