var a=Array.from({length:100},()=>Math.random())
a.sort((a,b)=>a-b);
a.reduce((a,c) => a < c ? a : c)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
sort | |
reduce |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
sort | 408763.9 Ops/sec |
reduce | 6104758.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmarking test case.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is defined by two script preparation codes:
a.sort((a,b)=>a-b);
a.reduce((a,c) => a < c ? a : c)
These scripts aim to sort an array of 100 random numbers in ascending order using the built-in sort
and reduce
methods, respectively.
Options Compared
The benchmark is comparing two approaches:
sort
method with a custom compare function that subtracts each element from its next neighbor.reduce
method to find the smallest number in the array.Pros and Cons
Sort Method:
Pros:
Cons:
Reduce Method:
Pros:
Cons:
Library Used
The benchmark does not explicitly use any external library. However, it relies on the built-in Array
prototype methods sort
and reduce
, which are part of the ECMAScript standard.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. It only utilizes the built-in methods and basic arithmetic operations.
Other Considerations
This benchmark highlights the trade-offs between using built-in methods versus custom implementation for common tasks like sorting arrays. The choice between sort
and reduce
depends on the specific requirements of your application, such as performance, readability, or memory usage.
Alternatives
If you prefer a different approach:
map
, every
, and findIndex
methods instead of sort
. These can provide more flexibility and control over the sorting process.Math.min()
function or implementing your own iterative approach.In summary, this benchmark provides a clear comparison between two approaches for sorting arrays: the built-in sort
method versus the reduce
method. While both have their pros and cons, the choice ultimately depends on the specific requirements of your application.