<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var length = 10
var message = "I like this website."
var results = _.times(length, () => {
return {
data: { notifications: {}, metadata: {} },
message,
}
});
var results = new Array(length);
for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) {
results[i] = {
data: { notifications: {}, metadata: {} },
message,
};
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash | |
Native Array & For Loop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash | 1984433.9 Ops/sec |
Native Array & For Loop | 1207514.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition
The website, MeasureThat.net, is comparing two approaches to generate an array of objects in JavaScript:
lodash.times
)new Array()
and a for loop.The goal is to measure which approach is faster.
Options Compared
lodash.times
): This method uses the Lodash library, a utility library that provides various functions to make JavaScript code more concise and efficient.new Array()
function to create an array and a for loop to populate it with objects.Pros and Cons
lodash.times
):Library Used
The lodash.times
method uses the Lodash library, which is a popular utility library for JavaScript. Lodash provides various functions to make JavaScript code more concise and efficient, including times
, which generates an array of objects.
JavaScript Feature/Syntax
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these test cases. The comparison focuses on the performance difference between two approaches.
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives for generating arrays of objects might include:
These alternative approaches would require additional benchmarking to determine their performance characteristics.