var str = "42";
const res = parseInt(str);
const res = Number(str);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
parseInt | |
Number |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
parseInt | 726397568.0 Ops/sec |
Number | 728054400.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, the options compared, pros and cons of each approach, and other considerations.
What is being tested?
The benchmark compares two functions: parseInt
and Number
, both used to convert a string representation of an integer to its numeric value. The test cases focus on converting the string "42" to an integer using these two functions.
Options compared
The two options are:
parseInt(str)
: Converts a string to an integer, interpreting the string as an integer literal if possible, or by parsing the string and returning a number if it represents an integer.Number(str)
: Converts a string to a number, without attempting to interpret the string as an integer.Pros and cons of each approach
parseInt(str)
:Number(str)
: parseInt
, as it has to perform additional checks.Library and syntax used
The benchmark uses JavaScript's built-in Number
function, which converts a string to a number by attempting to parse the string using a locale-dependent numeric conversion algorithm. The parseInt
function is also part of the JavaScript standard library.
No special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested in this benchmark.
Other alternatives
Other ways to convert a string to an integer in JavaScript could include:
parseInt
or Number
.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as optimized or efficient as the built-in functions used by parseInt
and Number
.
The provided benchmark result shows that both parseInt
and Number
are capable of converting the string "42" to an integer, but with slightly different performance characteristics. The Number
function seems to have a slight edge in terms of execution speed, while parseInt
might be more forgiving for invalid input strings.