var strA = "420343343242";
var strB = "420343343243";
var res = ~~strA > ~~strB;
var res = parseInt(strA) > parseInt(strB);
var res = Number(strA) > Number(strB);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
notnot | |
parseInt | |
Number |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
notnot | 2170864.8 Ops/sec |
parseInt | 940672.4 Ops/sec |
Number | 1080950.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, the options compared, pros and cons of each approach, and other considerations.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is comparing three different ways to compare two numbers: ~~
, parseInt
, and Number
. The test cases are:
notnot
: Compares the result of ~~
(two-tilda operator) on the strings strA
and strB
.parseInt
: Compares the result of parseInt(strA)
and parseInt(strB)
.Number
: Compares the result of Number(strA)
and Number(strB)
.Options Compared
The options being compared are:
~~
(two-tilda operator): A JavaScript operator that returns the integer part of a number, or the last character if the input is a string.parseInt(strA)
: A function that converts a string to an integer.Number(strA)
: A function that converts a string to a number.Pros and Cons
parseInt(strA)
:Number(strA)
:Library Used
None explicitly mentioned in this benchmark.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The two-tilda operator (~~
) is a special JavaScript operator that's not widely used. It was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and can be useful in specific situations, but it's not commonly used for integer comparisons.
Other Considerations
When choosing between these options, consider the following factors:
~~
is likely to be the fastest option due to its lightweight nature.parseInt
and Number
are more readable and intuitive than the two-tilda operator.parseInt
can throw errors if the input string is not a valid integer, while Number
will return NaN in such cases.Alternatives
Other alternatives for comparing numbers include:
<<
, >>
) to perform integer comparisonsMath.max
or Math.min