var arr = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++){
arr.unshift(i);
}
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++){
arr.push(i);
}
arr.reverse();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Unshift | |
Push + Reverse |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Unshift | 40.2 Ops/sec |
Push + Reverse | 496.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition provides two test cases:
unshift()
method.push()
) and then reversing the array using the reverse()
method.Options Compared
The benchmark compares two different approaches:
unshift()
method to add elements to the beginning of the array.push()
method to add elements to the end of the array and then reversing the array using the reverse()
method.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
reverse()
method is not optimized.Libraries Used
None of the provided benchmark definitions use any external libraries. The JavaScript code is self-contained and only uses built-in methods (unshift()
, push()
, and reverse()
).
Special JS Features or Syntax
There are no special JS features or syntax used in these benchmarks that require specific explanations.
Other Alternatives
If you were to modify the benchmark, you could consider adding alternative approaches, such as:
splice()
method to add elements at a specific position.concat()
method to concatenate an array with the original array and then reversing it.However, keep in mind that introducing new alternatives may require additional benchmarking efforts to ensure accurate results.
Benchmark Preparation Code
The provided JavaScript code prepares an empty array arr
using the following script:
var arr = [];
This is a simple initialization statement that ensures the test case starts with an empty array.
Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these points!