var arr = [10];
arr.unshift(1);
arr.reverse(); arr.push(1); arr.reverse();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
unshift | |
reverse push reverse |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
unshift | 31477.6 Ops/sec |
reverse push reverse | 2213.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark, arr unshift vs double reverse and push
, compares two approaches to manipulate an array:
arr.unshift(1)
: This approach adds a new element at the beginning of the array using the unshift()
method.arr.reverse(); arr.push(1); arr.reverse()
: This approach reverses the array, pushes a new element, and then reverses it again.Options being compared
The two approaches are compared to measure their performance. The options being compared include:
unshift()
to add an element at the beginning of the arrayPros and Cons of each approach:
arr.unshift(1)
:arr.reverse(); arr.push(1); arr.reverse()
:unshift()
, especially for large arraysunshift()
due to the reversal operationLibrary usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, it's likely that the push()
method uses an internal implementation that may vary depending on the JavaScript engine or browser being used.
Special JS features or syntax
None are explicitly mentioned in the provided test cases.
Other alternatives
Other approaches to manipulate arrays could be considered:
concat()
to create a new array with the added elementsplice()
to remove and replace elements at a specific indexThe choice of approach depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and the desired trade-offs between memory efficiency, speed, and code readability.
Benchmark preparation code
The provided script preparation code is:
var arr = [10];
This initializes an array with a single element, which will be used as the test subject for the benchmark.