Benchmark: template literals vs numeric hash vs bigint hash

Script Preparation code:

var name = "name";
var id = "id";

Tests:

using template literals
for (let i = 0; i < 80; ++i) { let result = `${id}: 1, ${name}: someItem`; }
numeric hash
for (let i = 0; i < 80; ++i) { let result = i << 16 | i; }
Bigint 256bit hash
for (let i = 0; i < 80; ++i) { let result = BigInt(i) << 128n | BigInt(i); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 10 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/113.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 113 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

template literals vs numeric hash vs bigint hash (version: 0)