var name = "name";
var id = "id";
for (let i = 0; i < 80; ++i) {
let result = id + ": 1, " + name + ": someItem";
}
for (let i = 0; i < 80; ++i) {
let result = `${id}: 1, ${name}: someItem`;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
using plus operator | |
using template literals |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
using plus operator | 49943.6 Ops/sec |
using template literals | 40376.9 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case on MeasureThat.net, which aims to compare three different approaches for concatenating strings in JavaScript.
Benchmark Name: "Native JS: concatenate string with + vs template literals vs String.concat my"
Description: The goal is to find the best solution for concatenating four strings.
Options being compared:
+
operator: This is a classic approach where you concatenate two or more strings using the +
operator.String.concat()
: Although deprecated since ES5, some developers might still use this method for concatenating strings.Pros and Cons of each approach:
+
operator:+
or concat()
calls, and is generally faster than using strings for simple concatenation.String.concat()
:The test case uses the id
and name
variables defined in the "Script Preparation Code" section, which are strings containing placeholder values.
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. It's a straightforward test to compare the performance of different string concatenation methods.
Alternative approaches:
String.prototype +=
: Although not shown in this benchmark, some developers might use this method for simple concatenations.concat()
.In conclusion, the benchmark highlights the importance of choosing efficient and readable ways to concatenate strings in JavaScript. Template literals are generally considered the best approach due to their readability, expressiveness, and performance advantages.