var array = new Array(1000);
var result = false;
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array[i];
if (i === 877) {
result = true;
}
}
array.some(function(i) {
return array[i] === 877;
});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for | |
some |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for | 4676.2 Ops/sec |
some | 420012.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the explanation into smaller parts.
What is being tested?
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using a traditional for
loop and using the Array.some()
method to iterate over an array.
Options compared:
for
loopArray.some()
methodPros and cons of each approach:
for
loop:Array.some()
method:Array.some()
.Library and its purpose:
The benchmark does not use any external libraries. However, Array.some()
is a built-in method in JavaScript that can be thought of as a library function for iterating over an array.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The code is written in standard JavaScript and only uses the Array
class and basic syntax elements like loops, conditional statements, and variables.
Other alternatives:
If you want to explore alternative approaches for iterating over arrays, some common options include:
for...of
loop (introduced in ECMAScript 2015)forEach()
methodreduce()
methodIt's worth noting that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs and performance characteristics, which may differ from the traditional for
loop and Array.some()
approach.