var example = 'there is no spoon'
var result = example.split(' ')
var result = []
result.push(example.substring(0, 5))
result.push(example.substring(6, 8))
result.push(example.substring(9, 11))
result.push(example.substring(12))
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
split | |
substring (hard coded) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
split | 7011641.5 Ops/sec |
substring (hard coded) | 3558555.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Description: The test compares the performance of three different string manipulation approaches in JavaScript:
split()
substring()
(with hardcoded indices)Options Comparison:
split()
: This method splits a string into an array of substrings based on a specified separator. In this case, we're splitting the string at each space character.substring()
with predefined indices.Benchmark Preparation Code:
The script preparation code creates a sample string example
containing the phrase "there is no spoon".
HTML Preparation Code: There is no HTML preparation code provided, suggesting that this benchmark is focused solely on JavaScript performance.
Test Cases:
split()
: This test case uses the split()
method with a space character as the separator.substring()
with predefined indices (5-6, 8-9, and an empty substring for the remaining characters).Library Usage: None of the provided code snippets use any external libraries or modules.
Special JavaScript Features/Syntax:
There are no special features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may optimize certain string methods, such as split()
or substring()
, for specific use cases (e.g., performance-critical code paths).
Alternative Approaches:
match()
and array comprehension: This approach could involve using the match()
method with a regular expression to extract substrings and then pushing them into an array using array comprehension.reduce()
or other iteration methods: Instead of pushing individual substrings, you might use reduce()
or another iteration method to create the resulting array.Keep in mind that these alternative approaches may not be as efficient or readable as the original code snippets, but they demonstrate other possible solutions for achieving the same result.