var example = 'there is no spoon'
var result = example.slice(10, -1)
var result = example.substring(10, example.length-1)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
substring |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 67914480.0 Ops/sec |
substring | 59259968.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is comparing three string manipulation methods in JavaScript: slice()
, substring()
, and substr()
(note that substr()
is not explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition, but it will be discussed later). The benchmark tests how fast each method performs when given a specific input string ("there is no spoon"
).
Options Compared
The two main options being compared are:
slice()
: This method returns a new string containing the characters from the specified start index (10) to the end of the string.substring()
: This method returns a new string containing the characters from the specified start index (10) to the specified end index (exclusive, i.e., -1).Pros and Cons
substring()
since it doesn't need to check if the start or end indices are within the bounds of the string. Cons: returns a new string, which can be inefficient in memory.slice()
due to the additional check.substr()
Although not explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition, substr()
is worth mentioning as it's a similar method to substring()
. The main difference is that substr()
does not require an explicit end index and will continue until the specified start index. However, this can lead to unexpected behavior if the input string is shorter than the start index. In general, substr()
is considered less efficient than slice()
due to its flexibility.
Library and Special JS Features
None of the methods being compared require any external libraries or special JavaScript features beyond basic understanding of strings and array methods. The benchmark only requires standard JavaScript functionality.
Other Considerations
When choosing between these methods, consider the following:
slice()
might be a better choice due to its efficiency.substring()
could be a better option.Alternatives
Other alternatives for string manipulation methods include:
RegExp
) for pattern matching and replacement.template literals
).String.prototype.replace()
method for character-by-character replacements.In summary, this benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance differences between various JavaScript string manipulation methods. By understanding these trade-offs, developers can make informed decisions about which methods to use depending on their specific use case and requirements.