var example = 'there is no spoon'
var result = example.split(' ')
var result = [
example.substring(0, 5),
example.substring(6, 8),
example.substring(9, 11),
example.substring(12),
]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
split | |
substring (hard coded) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
split | 7024341.5 Ops/sec |
substring (hard coded) | 4227114.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its components.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark compares three JavaScript methods: split
, substr
(also known as slice
), and their corresponding "correct" versions, which are not shown in the provided code snippet. The goal is to measure the performance of these methods when used with only a start index.
Script Preparation Code
A simple string variable named example
is created with the value 'there is no spoon'
.
HTML Preparation Code There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means this benchmark focuses solely on JavaScript execution and does not take into account DOM interactions or other UI-related factors.
Test Cases
split
method when used with only a start index. This method returns an array of substrings split at each space character.substring
method when used with hardcoded indices to extract specific parts of the string.Options Compared
The benchmark compares two approaches:
split
method, which returns an array of substrings.substring
method, where the start and end indices are hardcoded to extract specific parts of the string.Pros and Cons
split
method.Other Considerations
substring
method is not shown in the provided code snippet. This might indicate that the custom implementation is intended to mimic the behavior of the native split
method.Alternatives
Other alternatives for the split
and substring
methods include:
match()
method, which can also return an array of substrings.Keep in mind that these alternatives are not explicitly tested in this benchmark.