var nums = Array(1000).fill(0)
nums.reduce((acc, item) => acc + item, '')
nums.join().replaceAll(',', '')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
reduce | |
join |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
reduce | 88373.1 Ops/sec |
join | 32193.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches for merging an array:
reduce()
: This method applies a function against an accumulator and each element in the array (from left to right) to reduce it to a single value.join()
with replaceAll(',')
: The join()
method concatenates all elements of the array into a string, and then replaceAll(',', '')
removes all commas from the resulting string.Options compared
The benchmark is comparing these two approaches:
reduce()
join()
with replaceAll(',')
Pros and Cons:
Other considerations
reduce()
is a more versatile method that can be used for various reduction tasks beyond just concatenating arrays. However, it may require more code and be slower than join()
in some cases.Library usage
There is no library explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. The Array.prototype.reduce()
method is a built-in JavaScript function, and the String.prototype.join()
method is also built-in. However, if you were to use a custom implementation or a third-party library for string manipulation, it might affect the performance results.
Special JS features or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript syntax and features.
Now, let's look at the test cases:
reduce()
: This is a straightforward implementation of the reduce()
method.join() with Replacer
: This implementation concatenates the array elements using the join()
method and then replaces commas with an empty string using replaceAll(',')
.