var a = new Array(1000000).fill(undefined).map((_, i) => i)
var b = a.slice(0, 500000).concat(a.slice(500001))
var b = [a.slice(0, 500000), a.slice(500001)]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Using array.concat | |
Using array.spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Using array.concat | 271.8 Ops/sec |
Using array.spread | 101.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to test two different approaches for removing an item in the middle of an array of length 1,000,000. The goal is to compare the performance of using Array.concat
versus array spread
(also known as destructuring) to remove an element from the middle of the array.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code creates a large array a
with 1,000,000 elements, where each element is set to undefined
. The purpose of this code is to create a large, empty array that will be used for testing.
Html Preparation Code
There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means that the benchmark does not take into account any DOM-related operations or other non-array-related aspects.
Individual Test Cases
The test cases are designed to compare two different approaches:
Array.concat
: This approach uses the concat
method to remove an element from the middle of the array. Specifically, it creates a new array b
by concatenating two parts: the first half of the original array (a.slice(0, 500000)
) and the second half of the array (starting from index 500001).array spread
: This approach uses destructuring to remove an element from the middle of the array. Specifically, it creates a new array b
by spreading two parts: the first half of the original array (a.slice(0, 500000)
) and the second half of the array (starting from index 500001).Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
Array.concat
:slice
instead of indexing).array spread
:Library Usage
There is no explicit library usage in this benchmark, but it does use the built-in Array.prototype.slice()
method to create a new array slice from the original array. The array spread
approach uses the spread operator (...
) to create a new array by spreading two parts together.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is commonly used in modern JavaScript development. No ES6+ features, such as async/await, classes, or modules, are used.
Alternatives
If you wanted to rewrite this benchmark with alternative approaches, here are some options:
splice()
instead of concat
or spread.removeAt()
function.Keep in mind that the performance differences between these alternatives may vary depending on the specific use case and hardware.