var array = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 100000; i++){array.push(Math.random());}
array.pop();
array[array.length - 1];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
pop | |
length - 1 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
pop | 12192195.0 Ops/sec |
length - 1 | 4165738.8 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition
The provided benchmark definition json represents a simple test that compares two approaches to access the last element of an array: array.pop()
and array[array.length - 1]
.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
array.pop()
: This method removes and returns the last element from the array, modifying the original array.array[array.length - 1]
: This approach accesses the last element of the array without modifying it.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
array.pop()
:
Pros:
Cons:
array[array.length - 1]
:
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Special JS Features
In this benchmark, there are no specific libraries used. However, it's worth noting that array.pop()
is a built-in JavaScript method, while array[array.length - 1]
is also a built-in expression that accesses the last element of an array without modifying it.
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark.
Other Considerations
When writing microbenchmarks like this one, it's essential to consider factors such as:
array.pop()
may incur additional overhead due to internal array state updates.Alternative Benchmarks
Other alternatives for comparing these two approaches might include:
By considering these alternative approaches, you can gain a deeper understanding of how different scenarios affect the performance of array.pop()
and array[array.length - 1]
.