var array = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 100000; i++){array.push(Math.random());}
array.pop();
array[array.length - 1]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
pop | |
length |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
pop | 8136473.5 Ops/sec |
length | 2815832.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the benchmark.
What is tested?
The provided JSON represents two individual test cases that measure the performance of JavaScript operations on an array.
array.pop()
operation, which removes and returns the last element of the array.[array.length - 1]
.Options compared
In this benchmark, only two options are being compared:
array.pop()
: This method modifies the original array by removing and returning the last element.[array.length - 1]
: This approach accesses the last element directly using its index.Pros and Cons of each approach:
array.pop()
pop()
modifying the array.Library usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that array.pop()
and [array.length - 1]
are built-in JavaScript operators.
Special JS feature or syntax
None of the benchmarked operations use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's commonly used.
Other alternatives
If you're looking for alternative ways to access the last element of an array, you could consider using Array.prototype.at()
(introduced in ECMAScript 2019), which returns a reference to the element at the specified index:
array.at(-1);
Keep in mind that this method is not yet widely supported in older browsers.
In summary, the benchmark compares two common approaches for accessing the last element of an array: array.pop()
and [array.length - 1]
. While both have their pros and cons, array.pop()
can be a more concise option, but it modifies the original array. The [array.length - 1]
approach is safer and avoids modifying the array, but requires specifying the index.