<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.10/lodash.min.js"></script>
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
var b = [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
var c = _.union(a, b)
var c = new Set(a, b)
var c = new Set(a, b)
var d = c.has(3)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.union | |
Set() | |
Set() convert back to array |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.union | 1875063.6 Ops/sec |
Set() | 2472246.2 Ops/sec |
Set() convert back to array | 2518006.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is tested?
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches:
_.union
methodSet()
constructorBoth approaches are used to merge two arrays, a
and b
, into a new array with unique elements.
Options compared:
_.union
function from Lodash, which merges two arrays into a new array with duplicate values removed.Set()
constructor to merge two arrays into a set, and then converts the set back into an array.Pros and cons of each approach:
Library: Lodash
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a collection of functional programming helpers, including the _.union
function. The library includes over 100 functions for tasks like array manipulation, object transformation, and more.
Special JS feature/syntax: None mentioned in this benchmark
However, it's worth noting that set operations are a fundamental concept in JavaScript and can be used to perform various operations on data structures, such as removing duplicates or performing union/intersection/difference operations.
Other alternatives:
Array.prototype.concat()
, Array.prototype.filter()
, or other custom solutions. However, these options are generally less efficient than the native Set()
constructor approach.