<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
var b = [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
var c = _.union(a,b)
var c = [new Set([a,b])]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash | |
native set spread back to array |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash | 4550215.0 Ops/sec |
native set spread back to array | 7921608.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is tested, compared, and analyzed.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance difference between using _.union
from Lodash library versus creating an array from a set with the spread operator ([...]
) in JavaScript. The test cases are designed to compare these two approaches on arrays of similar sizes.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
[...]
), and then converts it back to an array.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief analysis of each approach:
Library and Purpose
In this benchmark, Lodash is used as a utility library, providing the _.union
function. The purpose of using Lodash here is to demonstrate how performance can vary when using different libraries versus native JavaScript implementations.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The use of the set spread operator ([...]
) is a relatively recent feature in JavaScript (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) that allows creating an array from an iterable (like a set). This syntax is concise and readable, but might not be familiar to all developers.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other approaches or alternatives:
Array.prototype.reduce()
instead of Lodash's _union()
.Set
data structure directly (without spreading it back into an array) for both input and output.In summary, this benchmark compares two approaches to creating a union from arrays: using Lodash's _union()
function versus the native set spread operator syntax. The pros and cons of each approach have been highlighted, as well as some potential alternatives for further exploration.