Benchmark: Underscore.js _forEach() vs Native for loop for large arrays (rewrite)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.6.0/underscore-min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var values = [{a: 30310}, {b: 100303}, {c: 3040494}]

Tests:

Underscore.js _forEach()
var count = 0; _.forEach(values, function(value) { if (value.a != null) { count++; } });
native for loop
var count = 0; for (var i = 0; i < values.length; i++) { if (values[i].a != null) { count++; } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Underscore.js _forEach()
native for loop

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/111.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 111 on Windows

Test name	Executions per second
Underscore.js _forEach()	24646240.0 Ops/sec
native for loop	46553880.0 Ops/sec

Underscore.js _forEach() vs Native for loop for large arrays (rewrite) (version: 0)