var arraySize = 10000;
var iterations = arraySize + 100;
var data = new Array(arraySize);
for(var index = 0; index < iterations; index++){
data.unshift({});
}
var data = [];
for(var index = 0; index < iterations; index++){
data.unshift({});
}
var data = [];
data.length = arraySize;
for(var index = 0; index < iterations; index++){
data.unshift({});
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
new Array | |
brackets | |
brackets with length |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
new Array | 25.7 Ops/sec |
brackets | 79.9 Ops/sec |
brackets with length | 27.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test created on MeasureThat.net, which allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of different ways to populate an array in JavaScript.
Benchmark Definition: The benchmark definition includes three test cases:
[]
to create an array)length
property)Options Compared:
new Array()
constructor (new Array
)[]
)brackets with length
)Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
new Array()
due to less memory allocation overheadnew Array()
Library or Special JS Feature: None of the test cases use any external libraries or special JavaScript features beyond basic syntax.
Other Considerations:
Alternatives: If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches or optimizing your own JavaScript array population methods, consider:
Array.from()
instead of new Array()
: This method creates an array from a specified iterable or array-like object.Map
or other data structures for larger arrays: Depending on the specific use case, using other data structures like Map
might be more efficient than traditional arrays.By understanding the trade-offs between different array population methods, you can make informed decisions about optimizing your JavaScript code for performance and scalability.