for(var test = new Array(1000), i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
test.push(i)
for(var test = [], i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
test.push(i)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
pre-allocated | |
variable size |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
pre-allocated | 38103.0 Ops/sec |
variable size | 119401.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definitions and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered.
Benchmark Definitions:
The two benchmark definitions are:
"for(var test = new Array(1000), i = 0; i < 1000; i++)\r\n test.push(i)"
:
This definition tests the performance of creating an array with a fixed size (1000 elements) and then pushing values into it using a for
loop.
"for(var test = [], i = 0; i < 1000; i++)\r\n test.push(i)"
:
This definition tests the performance of creating an empty array and then dynamically resizing it to accommodate 1000 elements, all while pushing values into it using a for
loop.
Comparison:
The two benchmarks are comparing the performance differences between:
Pros and Cons:
Library and Special JS Features:
There are no libraries or special JavaScript features explicitly mentioned in these benchmark definitions. However, note that JavaScript engines like V8 (used by Chrome) have implemented various optimizations and heuristics to improve array allocation and management performance.
Other Alternatives:
Some alternative approaches to test the performance of array allocation and resizing could include:
Array.prototype.push()
versus other methods like Array.prototype.splice()
.Array()
, new Int8Array(1000)
) on performance.const
vs. var
for declaring array variables.Keep in mind that these alternative approaches would require modifying or extending the provided benchmark definitions to accommodate new test cases and scenarios.