MeasureThat.net
  • Create a benchmark
  • Online Toolsnew
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

 RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match vs String.match(regex) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match vs String.match with regex

Created: one year ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • RegEx.test

  • String.includes

  • String.match

  • String.match with regex

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    RegEx.test
    String.includes
    String.match
    String.match with regex

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.
Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics
Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 109 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
RegEx.test 12527300.0 Ops/sec
String.includes 30034460.0 Ops/sec
String.match 7332568.0 Ops/sec
String.match with regex 8451095.0 Ops/sec