Benchmark: JQuery.grep vs Array.filter

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.4.1/jquery.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var array = [{id: "1", name: "1"}, {id: "2", name: "2"}, {id: "3", name: "3"}, {id: "4", name: "4"}, {id: "5", name: "5"}]
var needId = "3";

Tests:

$.grep
$.grep(array, function (element) { return element.id === needId; });
Array.filter
array.filter(function (element) { return element.id === needId; });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
$.grep
Array.filter

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gemma2:9b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

This benchmark compares two ways to find an element within an array: using jQuery's `$.grep` function and JavaScript's native `Array.filter` method.

**Options Compared:**

* **`$.grep(array, function (element) { return element.id === needId; })`**: This approach uses jQuery's `$.grep` function to filter the array. It takes two arguments: the array itself and a function that defines the filtering criteria. In this case, the function checks if an element's `id` property matches the desired `needId`.

* **`array.filter(function (element) { return element.id === needId; })`**: This approach utilizes the native `Array.filter` method available in JavaScript. It also takes two arguments: the array and a function that defines the filtering criteria. The function checks if an element's `id` property matches the desired `needId`.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **jQuery's `$.grep`**:
    * **Pros**:  Might be more familiar to developers who primarily use jQuery for DOM manipulation and event handling. 
    * **Cons**: Adds a dependency on the jQuery library, which increases the bundle size of your project. It can also introduce potential conflicts with other libraries that rely on jQuery's API.

* **`Array.filter`**:
    * **Pros**:  Native to JavaScript, so there are no external dependencies. More lightweight and efficient as it doesn't involve a separate library. Preferred for cleaner and more maintainable code.
    * **Cons**: Less familiar to developers who primarily focus on jQuery usage.

**Other Considerations:**

* In this specific case, both methods achieve the same outcome: finding the element with the matching `id`.  The choice between them often boils down to personal preference, project requirements (dependency on jQuery), and code readability.
* For more complex filtering scenarios or large datasets, the performance difference between these methods might become more noticeable.

**Alternatives:**

* **`findIndex()`**: This native JavaScript method returns the index of the first element in the array that satisfies the provided testing function. It's a concise alternative if you only need to find the *index* of the matching element.
* **`find()`**:  Similar to `findIndex()`, but it returns the actual element instead of just its index.

Remember that benchmarking results can vary depending on various factors like browser, hardware, and code execution environment.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 17 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:132.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/132.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 132 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
$.grep	8162505.0 Ops/sec
Array.filter	7132370.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

JQuery.grep vs Array.filter (version: 0)

Compare how to find need element with different functions

Comparing performance of: $.grep vs Array.filter

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

$.grep

Array.filter

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gemma2:9b, generated 28 days ago):